Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.


Decoding the McDonald's, Olympics sponsorship debate

27 July 2012, 10:59

We asked FitnessDoc Dr Ross Tucker what he thought of the McDonald’s sponsorship of the Olympics and what sort of message this sends out to the public. this is what he said:

It would of course be far better for the 2012 Olympic Games to avoid this kind of relationship.  In an ideal world, the sponsors would fit with the vision and ideal of the event, and companies like McDonald's would be excluded from the relationship.  

However, having said that, I don't quite go so far as to condemn the sponsorship with the same fears and concerns many others seem to have had.  As a physiologist, I am of course involved in and invested in health and wellness through exercise, and so the notion of McDonald's Golden Arch being the backdrop to the world's fittest and best athletes is surreal.  

However, I think there is something of an over-reaction by people as to how this piece of the puzzle fits into the global obesity epidemic.  I would be very surprised if the association that McDonald's has bought with the Olympic movement is in anyway creating a perception that McDonald's is healthy, or that people who see McDonald's as a sponsor are gullible enough to buy fast-food as a result.  

If they are, then they would likely be even more susceptible to a giant billboard along a highway or a television advertisement, and the presence of McDonald's at the Games is unlikely to turn them into regular fast-food eaters.

Conflicting messages?

I spent two years working in sports sponsorship, and so I know how the relationship works between the rights holder (the IOC in this instance) and the sponsor (McDonalds).  The reality, unfortunate as it may be, is that the kind of money that these corporations are willing to spend is essential to the sustainability of the sport and Games.

So when the IOC sells a sponsorship to McDonald's, they are admittedly opening themselves up to criticism for "selling out" and compromising the message of health and wellness that most people in the public perceive them to have.  Perhaps McDonald's are willing to pay a premium of millions for the association, in the hope that some people will see elite athletes somehow endorsing a fast-food burger chain.

But this is, in my opinion, is reading too much into this particular sponsorship.  I think more likely, McDonald's are looking at the Olympic Games as a huge billboard, an enormous global platform that allows their brand to reach billions of people.  In this regard, a sponsorship of the Olympic Games is no different to buying hundreds of billboards and television advertisements around the world for two weeks.  

Is it just advertising?

Should the Olympic Games make themselves available to be that platform?  Probably not, and in an ideal world, the sponsors that the IOC sought out would be a better fit to the Olympic ideals.  But I don't see the link between McDonald's and the Olympic Games as any more than a commercial transaction, and it does not, by my reading, lean on the Olympic ideals and try to portray a message to the general public that capitalises on "Olympism".   

If McDonald's tried to leverage their association with the IOC and came out with a series of advertisements similar to those of say, Powerade, where they made claims about being the ideal food for elite athletes, or if elite athletes started endorsing Big Macs, then it is another story, and they should be condemned for that.  But right now, it seems more like advertising, and I think if the public reads into this, then we should be looking in the mirror, because when a company like McDonald's spends millions on advertising, it is because they want to talk to "us".  

We create the market, we create the "monster" that is then fed through advertising and sales.  Our "appetite" allows them to invest in the Olympic Games to begin with.

So bottom line, the presence of a fast-food chain at the event that epitomises atleticism is surreal and probably inappropriate.  But whether this is sending out a tangible message that helps cause obesity, I'd question.



Read News24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Shakila Alivitsa
Types of men that are a waste of ...

Most women end up heartbroken because they were trying to convince the wrong man to be in a relationship/ marriage. Read more...

Submitted by
Shakila Alivitsa
Cheating is hardwork!

Cheating, although enjoyable by the person doing it initially, it gets to a point they start realizing that it was never even worth it. Read more...

Submitted by
Shakila Alivitsa
Dating that one person that socie...

Works at a massage parlour. Works at Millionaires Club (that one on Baricho road) - you know the ones I am talking about. Read more...

Submitted by
Shakila Alivitsa
Submitted by
Shakila Alivitsa
What do men mean when they say th...

As much as men think they are the ones confused by relationships, they have a better idea of it than most women actually do. Read more...

Submitted by
Wilson Ochieng
ODM rebels sweat in Kisii as Oran...

ODM rebels are sweating in Kisii after the Orange Party won by elections despite concerted efforts by the ruling Jubilee Party to win the elections. Read more...